Preferencia temporal, múltiples tipos de interés y la teoría austriaca del ciclo económico

Authors

  • Alejandro J. Zamora Máster en Economía por la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Licenciado en Derecho por ICADE. Licenciado en Administración y Dirección de Empresas por ICADE.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v13i1.124

Abstract

Traditional expositions of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) rest on the reference to only one – equilibrium – interest rate. This paper, on the one hand, explores the theoretical validity of such a reference and, on the other hand, analyses whether it is essential to the ABCT. To address both issues, we depart from a defense of the recently-disputed Pure Time Preference Theory (PTPT), which purports to explain the cause of the phenomenon of interest and serves as a basis for the ABCT. In the light of our study, in the first place, we reject some of the formulations of the PTPT that lead to erroneous interpretations of this theory and we put forward an enunciation that avoids common confu-sions; secondly, we deny the validity of the reference to only one interest rate as well as its essentiality to the ABCT; finally, we point out the necessity of up-dating the exposition of the ABCT in consonance with the previous conclusions.

Key words: Austrian Business Cycle Theory, Business Cycles, Pure Time Prefe-rence Theory, Interest Rates, Term Structure of Interest Rates.

JEL Classification: E32, E40, E43, E50, B53.

Resumen: Las exposiciones tradicionales de la Teoría Austriaca del Ciclo Eco-nómico (TACE) se apoyan en la referencia a un único tipo de interés de equili-brio. Este artículo, por un lado, explora la cuestión de la validez teórica de dicha referencia y, por otro, estudia si ésta es realmente esencial a la TACE. Para analizar dichas cuestiones, partimos de una defensa de la recientemente cuestionada Teoría de la Preferencia Temporal Pura (TPTP), teoría que preten-de explicar la causa del fenómeno del interés y que sirve de fundamento a la TACE. A la luz de nuestro estudio, en primer lugar, rechazamos ciertas formu-laciones de la TPTP que conducen a interpretaciones erróneas de la misma, proponiendo una enunciación de la teoría que evita confusiones comunes; se-gundo, negamos la validez de la referencia a un tipo de interés único y su carácter esencial a la TACE; por último, notamos la necesidad de actualizar la exposición de la TACE conforme a las conclusiones antedichas.

Palabras clave: Teoría Austriaca del Ciclo Económico, Ciclos Económicos, Teo-ría de la Preferencia Temporal Pura, Tipos de Interés, Estructura de Tipos de Interés.

Clasificación JEL: E32, E40, E43, E50, B53.

References

BAGUS, P. (2010): «Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Are 100 Percent Reserves Sufficient to Prevent a Business Cycle?», Libertarian Pa-pers, vol. 2, art. no. 2.

BAGUS, P. y HOWDEN D. (2009): «The Legitimacy of Loan Maturity Mis-matching: A Risky, but Not Fraudulent, Undertaking», Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 399-406.

— (2010): «The Term Structure of Savings, the Yield Curve, and Ma-turity Mismatching», Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 64-85.

BARNETT, W. y BLOCK, W. (2009a): «Time Deposits, Dimensions, and Fraud». Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 711-716.

— (2009b): «Crash and Carry: Financial Intermediaries, the Inter-temporal-Carry Trade, and Austrian Business Cycles», Etica y Po-litica / Ethics and Politics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 455-469.

BENATI, L. y GOODHART, C. (2007): «Investigating Time-Variation in the Marginal Predictive Power of the Yield Spread», European Central Bank Working Paper Series, no. 802, (August).

BISMANS, F. y MOUGEOT, C. (2009): «Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Empirical Evidence», Review of Austrian economics, vol. 22, pp. 241-247.

BLOCK, W. (1978): «The Negative Interest Rate: Toward a Taxonomic Critique», Journal of Libertarian Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121-124.

BORDO, M. y HAUBRICH J. (2004): «The Yield Curve, Recessions, and the Credibility of the Monetary Regime: Long Run Evidence 1875-1997», N.B.E.R. Working Paper, no. 10431 (April).

DAVIDSON, L. (2014): «The Economic Consequences of Loan Maturity Mismatching in the Unhampered Economy», The Quarterly Jour-nal of Austrian Economics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 67-91.

ESTRELLA, A. y TRUBIN, M. (2006): «The Yield Curve as a Leading Indi-cator: Some Practical Issues», Federal Reserve Bank of New York Cur-rent Issues in Economics and Finance, vol. 12, no. 5.

FETTER, F. (1904): Principles of Economics, Nueva York, The Century Co.

FISHER, I. (1896): Appreciation and Interest, Nueva York, Macmillan.

FRIEDMAN, M. y SCHWARTZ, A.J. (1971): Monetary History of the United States 1867-1960, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

GARRISON, R. (1979): «In Defense of the Misesian Theory of Inter-est», Journal of Libertarian Studies, vol. 3, no. 2 (141-150).

— (1988): «Professor Rothbard and the Theory of Interest», En BLOCK, W. y ROCKWELL, L.H. (1988): Man, Economy and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard, Auburn (Alabama), The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

GLASSNER, D. y ZIMMERMAN, P.R. (2014): «The Sraffa-Hayek Debate on the Natural Rate of Interest», Disponible en <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2221695>.

HAYEK, F. VON (1967 [1931]): Prices and Production, Nueva York, Au-gustus M. Kelly.

— (1932): «Money and Capital: A Reply», The Economic Journal, vol. 42, no. 166 (June): pp. 237-249.

HEBERNER, J.M. (2011): The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest, Au-burn (Alabama), Ludwig von Mises Institute.

HUERTA DE SOTO, J. (1998): Dinero, Crédito Bancario y Ciclos Económi-cos, Madrid, Unión editorial [5º edición, 2011].

HÜLSMANN, J.G. (1997): «Knowledge, Judgment, and the Use of Prop-erty», Review of Austrian Economics, pp. 23-48.

— (1998): «Toward A General Theory of Error Cycles», Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1-23.

— (2000): «A Realist Approach to Equlibrium Analysis», Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3-51.

— (2002): «A Theory of Interest», Quarterly Journal of Austri-an Economics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 77-110.

— (2003): «Facts and Counterfactuals in Economic Law», Journal of Libertarian Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 57-102.

KEELER, J. (2001a): «Empirical Evidence on the Austrian Business Cycle Theory», Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 331-351.

— (2001b): «Relative Prices and the Business Cycle», Paper present-ed at the Southern Economic Association Annual Meetings in Tampa, the Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, Session 42C: Research in Empirical Austrian Economics.

KEYNES, J.M. (1936): The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Londres, Macmillan.

KIRZNER, I.M. (1993): «The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest: An Attempt at Clarification», En HEBERNER, J.M. (1993): The Meaning of Ludwig von Mises: Contributions in Economics, So-ciology, Epistemology, and Political Philosophy, Norwell (Massa-chusetts), Kluwer Academic Publishers.

LACHMANN, L.M. (1978a [1956]): Capital and its Structure, Kansas City, Sheed Andews and McMeel.

— (1978b): «Vicissitudes of Subjectivism and the Dilemma of the Theory of Choice», En LAVOIE, D. (2005 [1994]): Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions, Nueva York, Routledge.

— (1986): «Austrian Economics under Fire: The Hayek-Sraffa Duel in Retrospect», En LAVOIE, D. (2005 [1994]): Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions, Nueva York, Routledge.

MISES, L. VON (1998): Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. The Scholar’s Edition, Auburn (Alabama), Ludwig von Mises Institute.

MULLIGAN, R. (2002): «A Hayekian Analysis of the Term Structure of Production», Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 17-33.

— (2006): «An Empirical Examination of Austrian Business Theo-ry», The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 66-93.

MURPHY, R.P. (2003): Unanticipated Intertemporal Exchange in Theories of Interest, Doctoral Dissertation, New York University, Disponi-ble en <http://consultingbyrpm.com/uploads/Dissertation.pdf> (2010): «Multiple Interest Rates and the Austrian Business Cycle Theory», Disponible en <http://consultingbyrpm.com/uploads/Multiple%20Interest%20Rates%20and%20ABCT.pdf>.

PELLENGAHR, I. (1996): The Austrian Subjective Theory of Interest, Frankfurt, Peter Lang.

REISMAN, G. (1996): Capitalism. A Treatise on Economics, Ottawa (Illi-nois), Jameson Books.

ROBBINS, L. (1971 [1934]): The Great Depression, Nueva York, Freeport.

ROTHBARD, M.N. (2004): Man, Economy and State, with Power and Mar-ket, Scholar’s Edition, Auburn (Alabama), The Ludwig von Mises Institute [2º edición, 2009].

— (1963): America’s Great Depression, Auburn (Alabama), The Lud-wig von Mises Institute [5º edición, 2000].

SKOUSEN, M. (1990): The Structure of Production, Nueva York, New York University Press.

SRAFFA, P. (1932a): «Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital», The Economic Journal, vol. 42, no. 165 (March), pp. 42-53.

— (1932b): «[Money and Capital]: A Rejoinder», The Economic Jour-nal, vol. 42, no. 166 (June), pp. 249-251.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Zamora, A. J. . (2016). Preferencia temporal, múltiples tipos de interés y la teoría austriaca del ciclo económico. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 13(1), 13–63. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v13i1.124

Issue

Section

Articles