The Chicago Plan Revisited: An Austrian critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v13i1.130Abstract
Within the context of the economic crisis since 2007 a space for fundamental reflection on the institutional structure of the finan-cial system has been opened, allowing for the introduction of sig-nificant reform proposals in the economic discourse. The IMF economists Jaromir Benes and Michael Kumhof published a work-ing paper in August 2012, reintroducing the Chicago Plan as such a proposal.2 Following up the work of Irving Fisher (1935)3 the au-thors propose the separation of the monetary and the credit func-tions of the banking system, by requiring 100% reserve backing for deposits. This plan is designed to eliminate the possibilities for private banks to create money through fractional reserve banking and is supposed to give governments the complete control over money issuance. The central bank, upgraded as a powerful mone-tary commission, is seen as the best candidate to serve as a state’s monetary authority in the exercise of its monetary prerogative (monopoly of currency, money issuance, and seigniorage).
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the ele-ments of this reform proposal, contrast it with a recapitulatory display of the Austrian analysis and evaluate the plan based on its political desirability.
In the first step, the original plan from 1935 by Irving Fisher is presented. Second, the newest version and the key findings of Ben-es and Kumhof are summarized. Third the Austrian critique of fractional reserve banking and central banking is laid out. In the fourth step, a response to a peculiarity of the working paper about the origin of money is offered. In conclusion a brief discussion on the likelihood of political implementation and the evaluation from the Austrian perspective close the argumentation.
References
ALLEN, WILLIAM (1993) Irving Fisher and the 100% Reserve Proposal, Journal of Law and Economics (October 1993), p. 703 – 717.
BAGUS, PHILIPP and BAGUS, HOWDEN (2010), Fractional Reserve Free Banking: Some Quibbles, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Econom-ics, Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 29-55.
BENES, JAROMIR and KUMHOF MICHAEL (2012) The Chicago Plan Revisit-ed, IMF Working Paper: http://www.imf.org/external/re-search/index.aspx.
BRENNAN, GEOFFREY and EUSEPI, GIUSEPPE (2004) Fiscal Constitutionalism, in: Handbook of Public Finance (2004) Backhaus, Jürgen and Wagner, Richard E. (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Ned.
BUCHANAN, JAMES (2010) The Constitutionalization of Money, Cato Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Spring/Summer 2010).
BURNS, SCOTT (2016) Old (Chicago) school, new century: the link between Knight and Simons’ Chicago plan to Buchanan’s constitutional mon-ey, Constitutional Political Economy, p. 1-20.
CANTILLION, RICHARD (2001) Essay on the Nature of Commerce in Gener-al, Transaction Publishers: London.
EUCKEN, WALTER (2004) Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik, Mohr Sie-beck: Tübingen.
FOSS, NIKOLAI J. (2012) The Continuing Relevance of Austrian Capital Theory, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 15, Nr. 2 (Summer 2012), p. 151 – 171.
GARRISON, ROGER (1983) Gold: A Standard And An Institution, Cato Journal, Vol. 3, Nr. 1 (Spring 1983), p. 233 – 238.
GRAEBER, DAVID (2011) Debt, The First 5000 Years, Melville House Publishing: New York.
HAYEK, FRIEDRICH A. VON (1933) Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle, in: Prices and Production and Other Works (2008), Salerno, Jo-seph (Ed.), Ludwig von Mises Institute: Auburn, Alabama.
HUERTA DE SOTO, JESÚS (1999) Juan de Mariana: The Influence of the Spanish Scholastics, in: 15 Great Austrian Economists (1999), Hol-combe, Randall G. (Ed.), Ludwig von Mises Institute: Auburn, Alabama.
— (2009) Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles, Ludwig von Mis-es Institute: Auburn, Alabama.
— (2013) Sozialismus, Wirtschaftsrechnung und unternehmerische Funktion, Lucius & Lucius: Stuttgart.
LAURES, JOHN, S.J. (1928) The Political Economy of Juan de Mariana, Fordham University Press: New York.
MENGER, CARL (1892/ 2009) On the Origins of Money, Ludwig von Mises Institute: Auburn, Alabama.
MISES, LUDWIG VON (1998) Human Action, The Scholar´s Edition, Lud-wig von Mises Institute: Auburn, Alabama.
FISHER, IRVING (2007) 100%-Geld, Verlag für Sozialökonomie: Kiel.
WAGNER, RICHARD E. (1986) Central Banking and the Fed: A Public Choice Perspective, Cato Journal, Vol. 6, Nr. 2 (Fall 1986), p. 519 – 543.
REINHART, CARMEN and ROGOFF, KENNETH (2009) This time is different, Princeton University Press: Princeton.
ROTHBARD, MURRAY N. (1995) Economic Thought Before Adam Smith, Ludwig von Mises Institute: Auburn, Alabama.
— (2002) The Ethics of Liberty, New York University Press: New York.
SCHUMPETER, JOSEPH A. (2008) The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, New Jersy.
SELGIN, GEORGE (1988) The Theory of Free Banking: Money Supply under Competitive Note Issue. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.
