Blocking progress in Austrian economics: a rejoinder

Authors

  • Mark Skousen Chapman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v14i2.79

Abstract

This paper shows that Block and Barnett (BnB) critique of Gross Out-put (GO) is wrong-headed and misguided, and is another sad example of why their limited version of Austrian economics is blocking the progress of the best that Austrian economics has to offer to the profession.

I reject BnB’s assertion that GO is a «new threat to economic freedom» and «another government con.» To the contrary, the quarterly release of GO data has gone a long way to dispel falsehoods about the economy and government policies, while adding important information about how the economy works. It’s a triumph in supply- side Austrian economics, and should be celebrated by free-market economists everywhere.

Keywords: Gross Output (GO), Austrian economics, structure of production, Hayek triangle, consumer spending.

JEL Classification: B53, E23, E25.

Resumen: Este trabajo muestra que la crítica de Block y Barnett (BnB) a la pro-ducción bruta (GO) es errónea y equivocada, y es otro triste ejemplo de por qué su versión limitada de la economía austriaca está bloqueando el progreso de lo mejor que la economía austriaca puede ofrecer a la profesión.

Concretamente, este trabajo rechaza la afirmación de BnB de que GO es una «nueva amenaza a la libertad económica» y «otra estafa del gobierno». Por el contrario, la publicación trimestral de datos de GO ha recorrido un largo camino para disipar falsedades sobre la economía y las políticas gubernamen-tales, al tiempo que proporciona información sobre cómo funciona la econo-mía. GO representa un triunfo para la economía austriaca de la oferta, y debe ser celebrado por los economistas del mercado libre en cualquier parte.

Palabras clave: Producto bruto (GO), economía austriaca, estructura de la pro-ducción, triángulo de Hayek, gasto del consumidor.

Clasificación JEL: B53, E23, E25.

References

barnett II, William and Walter E. Block. 2016. “Gross Output – Another Government Con.” Revista Procesos de Mercado Autumn, Volume XIII, no. 2, pp. 13-39

Colander, David. 2014. “Gross Output.” Eastern Economic Journal 40:451-455.

CounCil oF eConoMiC advisors. 2015. “A better measure of eco-nomic growth: gross domestic output (GDO)”; Economic Report of the President. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/gdo_issue_brief_final.pdf

epstein, Gene. 2014. “A New Way to Gauge the Economy,” Barron’s, April 26, 2014: http://www.barrons.com/articles/SB50001424053111903409104579515671290511580

Forbes, Steve. 2014. “New, Revolutionary Way To Measure The Econ-omy Is Coming — Believe Me, This Is A Big Deal.” Forbes Magazine (April 14): http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2014/03/26/this-may-save-the-economoy-from-keynesians-and-spend-happy-pols/

Garrison, Roger B. 2000. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.

Gilder, George. 2013. Knowledge and Power. Washington, DC: Regn-ery.

hanke, Steve. 2014. “GO: J. M. Keynes Versus J.-B. Say,” Globe Asia (July) http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/go-jm-keynes-versus-j-b-say

Gwartney, James, Robert W. Lawson and Walter E. Block. 1996. Eco-nomic Freedom of the World, 1975-1995. Vancouver, B.C. Canada: the Fraser Institute.

hayek, Friedrich A. 1935 [1931]. Prices and Production. 2nd ed. Lon-don: Routledge.

JorGenson, Dale W, J. Stephen Landefeld, and William D. Nord-haus. 2006. A New Architecture for the US National Accounts. Chi-cago: NBER and University of Chicago Press.

kuhn, Thomas S. 1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

ranson, R. David. 2015. “Alternative data to track the economy and better explain capital-market prices,” Economy Watch, HCWE & Co., November 3. http://www.hcwe.com/trials/EW-1015.pdf.

rothbard, Murray N. 2000 [1962]. America’s Great Depression. 5th ed. Auburn, Alabama: Mises Institute.

skousen, Mark. 2007. Vienna and Chicago, Friends or Foes? (Washing-ton, DC: Capital Press).

— 2014a. “At Last, a Better Economic Measure” lead op ed, Wall Street Journal, April 23, 2014: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303532704579483870616640230

— 2014b. Economic Logic. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Capital Press.

— 2015 [1990]. The Structure of Production. New York: New York University Press.

— 2015. “Linking Austrian Economics to Keynesian Economics,” Journal of Private Enterprise, Winter: http://journal.apee.org/index.php?title=Parte7_Journal_of_Private_Enterprise_vol_30_no_4.pdf

taylor, John B. 2006. Economics. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Downloads

Published

2017-10-07

How to Cite

Skousen, M. . (2017). Blocking progress in Austrian economics: a rejoinder. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 14(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v14i2.79

Issue

Section

Articles